 |
| Photo (c) Children In Need India |
Like many people ‘of colour’, I am occasionally subject to a
random dousing of imprecise and pejorative cultural clichés by ignorant people
with a superiority complex, just like a delicate lotus blossom caught in a
balmy, allegorical, toxic monsoon shower.
Woman in publishing, at literary festival: “What do you do?”
Me: “At the moment I’m working with the Gates Foundation and
Johns Hopkins
University, reporting on international
development? No, before you ask, I haven’t met the Gates’s. The next thing I’m
doing is on maternal health, I think. It’s really interesting.”
Woman in publishing: “Oh! That’s so interesting because the
other day I was thinking to myself, I had trouble with my two pregnancies and
if I’d been having my babies in the developing world, I wouldn’t have survived.
Do you know [random British Asian woman in publishing PR]? Because you look
like her and you remind me of her.”
Me: ???
I have no doubt that I in no way resemble the one other
Asian person Publishing Woman has met in her working life. Poor PW, we met for
10 minutes out of nowhere and she couldn’t stop talking about race, refugees,
poverty and the pathetic ills of the ‘developing world’ – it’s like she had racial
Tourettes. And had I been able to recover from the speechlessness that
afflicted me at the crucial moment, despite the fact that I talk for a living,
I would have asked her which country exactly in ‘the developing world’ (which
bigots usually take to mean everywhere or possibly anywhere from Senegal, across
Libya, Somalia, Congo, down to Mozambique, then up through Iraq, Iran,
Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, definitely India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and
then possibly through to rural China perhaps… and maybe Burma, or rural
Indonesia…and maybe also acrossways to some countries in South and Latin
America, oh and the Caribbean islands maybe too, and gosh even some parts of
Greece?) she meant, and then which region in which country.
The whole thing – or rather, her gloating and ignorance –
made me think of an article I wrote a long while back, about Children in Need
India. I described ‘
two Indias’: that of the extremely numerous privileged middle
class, who have the finest education, prospects, family support, influence,
connections and healthcare; and that of the poorest, who despite the general
dynamism, ambition and industry of today’s India still suffer due to lack of
access to healthcare, education, influence, rights and justice. So often, it is
only the second
India
that the wider world sees. It pains me, as a British Indian, that the rest of
the world is blind to the incredible humour, energy, intelligence, broadness
and enlightenment I see everywhere in
India.
In many ways, as a woman I find Indian culture much more sisterly and
infinitely less misogynistic, judgemental, brittle, sleazy, objectifying,
ageist-sexist and dollybirdish than British culture – but that’s a subject for
another article.
Still, when it comes to society’s least advantaged, there
are certain issues which cannot be ignored. India has a population of around 1
billion people and poverty, hunger, illness, gender and class injustice, lack
of access, lack of rights, abuse, exploitation and geographical isolation from
sources of both power and assistance (such as healthcare) are
disproportionately weighted against those with the least. In short, despite India’s
great achievements and many distinguished citizens, there are still an awful
lot of poor, disempowered, ill and hungry people.
Looking back through Children in Need India’s work since I wrote that first 'two Indias' article, it is clear that solving the most fundamental problems must start from birth. I was intrigued by
CINI because it started up with just two clinics for deprived children in Kolkata, where my mother’s family are from, and has since grown into a much larger organisation operating in West Bengal.
They present some sobering statistics, from Unicef studies:
- Infant mortality is highest in India than anywhere else in the world. According to Unicef’s 2010 figures, the majority of the 6,000 children who die in India every day, the majority are from preventable causes.
- Almost a half of all children under the age of five in India are clinically malnourished (Unicef study, January 2012)
- According to Unicef’s 2005 figures women in India are 80 times more likely to die during childbirth than in the UK due to lack of access to basic healthcare and monitoring during pregnancy for poorer women, as well as malnutrition and anaemia, which are linked.
There are further statistics – all, sadly, predictable – relating to rates of child labour, the possible consequence of exploitation and abuse of children who labour, the young age of girls’ marriage in rural areas, relatively low rates of child education (education in India is now free for all but uniforms and books can be expensive) and the knock-on effect in terms of adult literacy and, of course, gender equality.
This month the Wilson Centre in America held an extremely wide-ranging conference on Maternal Health in India: Emerging Priorities. There is a brilliant
sum-up and full footage of the conference here. Taking place across New Delhi, Boston and Washington, the speakers argued strongly for the issue of maternal health to be seen in the context of multiple underlying social, health and economic factors, pointing out the importance of the following:
- More attention must be paid to women's health after giving birth - focusing on morbidity, not just mortality - and ensuring that all of a woman's health needs, from family planning to sexual health, are met in the same (geographical) place by the same people or organisation.
- The importance of family planning: fewer pregnancies, with longer gaps in between, are better for women's physical and mental health and the health of their babies.
- The importance of post-partum health care.
- The effects of gender inequality on women's health: early marriages leading to early and numerous births; violence against women; the underprivileging of female family members when it comes to feeding/serving, leaving women with the worst and least food (leading to malnutrition and anaemia) and the most and hardest labour.
- Disenfranchisement due to caste or other low class status.
When it comes to healthcare, the best work is done through
direct outreach, local engagement and the creation of long term relationships
and structures:
in this film, CINI describes visiting people door to door, inviting local people to
meetings, the setting up of ‘panchayat’ council meeting where citizens speak up
about what they need and are also educated and informed of their rights. In
this way, the fundamentals – health, education, nutrition – are slowly
strengthened. One intriguing project, which kills two birds with one stone (so
to speak… actually it gives life to two birds with one stone…) is the
‘Nutrimix’ nutritional project: this is a nutritional food supplement which
benefits Under-5s, which is sold by women to their local communities at a low
price, but with a small profit. It
incentivises the women to sell and benefits them financially, while also aiding
child health.
Other solutions are more traditional, like drop-in clinics
giving advice on prenatal care, nutrition, vaccinations (one doctor in CINI’s
film talks positively about the success of the polio vaccination project at her
clinic – once mothers see how simple it is, they are bringing as many local
children as they can), reproductive health and more. Still, the strong theme of
gender inequality, sexual exploitation and hypocrisy cuts through all of these
issues. The clinic deals with STI’s, among other things, and it is left
tactfully open as to where the STIs come from (hint: it’s not the women). Many
of the women having babies are under-nourished because, even in a generally
poor family, the men and boys will be privileged and the mother will eat last.
In the film, one doctor at a baby clinic gestures to a patient and points out
that the woman (and by consequence her baby) is under-nourished and in frail
health because, due to a lack of contraception and consideration from her husband, she
has too many children, who she can’t feed and is visibly too exhausted to look after.
Still, it is these same women who are
finding a voice. We
see them taking a stand not only in their local area – one example is of women
going door-to-door and educating their neighbours about the importance of
environmental health and sanitary local conditions, which help to prevent the
spread of germs – but also speaking out against the marrying-off of girls at a young
age and insisting on the right for all children, whether they are boys or
girls, to be educated. They are also empowered to demand safe and adequate
healthcare. As one woman says: “We also want all mothers to be able to give
birth in a hospital, without the risks of a home birth.”
PS. There is also, by the way, a really shocking report into
children in
India
growing up surrounded by the
sex exploitation industry. Honestly, Johns of the world, when will you get it? It’s
immoral to buy a woman to use as a piece of meat to satisfy you, to give you 5
seconds of pleasure and a feeling of control. We are human beings.